• Judgments-L

  • A | B | D | E | F | G | H | I | | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z  


    • Lakshmi Kant Pandey Vs. Union of India- Writ Petition -Crl- No. 1171 Of 1982- 1984 (2) SCC 244- Child is soul- 1984(2) SCC 244- Adoption- CARA- HAMA- POSCO- Ocular Evidence, Medical Evidence, Forensic Evidence, Documentary Evidence, Police Investigation- Age Determination [Full PDF Judgment-SC-06.02.1984] [Full PDF Judgment-SC-02.02.1984]. 
    • Lalita Kumari Versus Government Of Uttar Pradesh-SC-27.02.2012 & 12.11.2013- WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 68 OF 2008- (2014) 2 SCC 1- Registration of FIR- Issue, whether “a police officer is bound to register a First Information Report (FIR) upon receiving any information relating to commission of a cognizable offence under Section-154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) or the police officer has the power to conduct a “preliminary inquiry” in order to test the veracity of such information before registering the same?” [Full PDF Judgment].
    • Lalit Mohan Madhan  Vs. Reliance Capital Ltd.- DelHC-07.12.2017- O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 439/2017– Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [SARFAESI Act]-S-13(2) and 13(4)- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996- Section-9- Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Bankruptcy Act, 1993 [DRT Act] Simultaneous proceedings under the SARFAESI & Arbitration Act permissible [Full PDF Judgment].
    • Lata Pramod Dave Versus M/s. Mode Export Private Limited, Criminal Writ Petition No.3188 OF 2014, Judgment Dated: 17.03.2016, Bench: Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J, Bombay High Court [Full PDF Judgments]. 
    • Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.- SC-07.07.2006-AIR 2006 SC 2522- Writ Petition(Crl.)  208 of 2004- Quashing of FIR- Writ of certiorari- Writ of mandamus- A live-in relationship between two consenting adults of heterosexual sex does not amount to any offence even though it may be perceived as immoral [Full PDF Judgment].
    • Laxmi Vs. Union Of India & Others, Writ Petition (Criminal) 129 Of 2006-[Full PDF Judgment-SC-06.02.2015] [Full PDF Judgment-SC-10.04.2015- ]. 
    • L. Chandra Kumar Versus Union Of India & Ors., Judgment Dated- 02.12.1994- 1997 (3) SCC 261- Issue, formation of Administrative Tribunals [Full PDF Judgments].
    • Lekh Raj [State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Lekh Raj]- Crl. Appeal- 1174/1999- SC-02.11.1999- 2000 CrLJ 44- Ulterior motive- Discrepancies not amounting to contradiction [Full PDF Judgments].
    • Lily Isabel Thomas vs Unknown- Petition No. 42 Of 1963- 4JBSC-14.01.1964- AIR 1964 SC 855, 1964 CriLJ 724, 1964 6 SCR 229- Quashing- The proper construction of  Art-145 (1)(a) of the Constitution- Ultra vires- Rule 16 of Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, proving for Advocates on record- Advocate on Record is an advocate who is entitled under the Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 (previously Order IV of the Supreme Court of India Rules, 1966), framed under Article 145 of the Constitution, to act as well as to plead for a party in the Supreme Court of India [Full PDF Judgment].
    • Lily Thomas Vs. UOI- SC-05.05.2000- WP(C)- 798/1995= WP(C)-1079/1989- 2013-7-SCC-653= 2000 Crl.LJ 2433- Muslim Laws- Quashing- Legislation-Sub-Section (4) Of Section 8 Of The Representation Of The People Act, 1951 Is Ultra Vires The Constitution [Full PDF Judgment].
    • Levi Strauss & Co. Rajesh Agarwal- RFA 127 of 2007- DelHC-03.01.2018- Held, “11. The rationale behind Order 26 Rule 10 (2) of CPC is clear i.e. the Commissioner is appointed as a representative of the Court and evidence collected by the Commissioner along with the report of the Commissioner would be evidence in the suit, subject to any objection raised by any party. If any party has any objection to Commissioner’s report or to the evidence, such party has an option to examine the Commissioner personally in open Court. Such examination is however, neither compulsory nor required especially in cases where the party does not challenge the report.” [Full PDF Judgment].

    Kindly CLICK HERE or e-mail us at office@hellocounsel.com if you are facing any Legal Issue and want to have Legal Consultations with the empanelled Lawyers at Hello Counsel.

    A | B | D | E | F | G | H | I | | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z  

All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove